Nameserver delegation represents a critical security control point for Web3 projects. While blockchain transactions may be secured by cryptographic protocols, the DNS infrastructure directing users to your platform remains vulnerable to attacks. This technical guide explains how to secure nameserver delegations for crypto, DeFi, and Web3 platforms.

 

—

DomainSure seals the Web2 back door before attackers can open it.

👉 Download the free Domain & DNS Security for Crypto, DeFi and Web3 Platforms white paper now.

—

Introduction: The Critical Vulnerability in Web3 Infrastructure

The Web3 ecosystem faces an escalating threat from nameserver delegation attacks. According to Hacken’s Q1 2025 Security Report, over $2 billion was lost in Web3 security incidents in just the first three months of 2025, with a significant portion attributed to infrastructure-level attacks rather than smart contract vulnerabilities. Research by DomainSure documented that 17 significant domain hijacking attacks targeting crypto projects since 2022 resulted in total losses exceeding $100 million.

These attacks succeed because they exploit a fundamental disconnect in Web3 security: while blockchain transactions may be secured by advanced cryptography, the domains directing users to these platforms rely on traditional DNS infrastructure that wasn’t designed with the high-stakes security requirements of crypto projects in mind.

For Web3 platforms, the stakes are particularly high. When a traditional website experiences a nameserver compromise, the damage is typically limited to brand reputation and potential data theft. When a crypto platform’s nameservers are compromised, users can lose millions in digital assets within minutes through malicious frontends that appear identical to legitimate interfaces.

This security gap exists largely because many Web3 security teams focus exclusively on blockchain-level security while overlooking the critical DNS layer. Understanding and securing nameserver delegation is the first step toward closing this dangerous vulnerability.

 

Understanding Nameserver Delegation

Nameserver delegation establishes which DNS servers are authoritative for your domain. This delegation occurs at the registrar level and determines where all DNS queries for your domain are directed.

The Technical Delegation Process

The delegation process follows a hierarchical path through the DNS system:

1. Root Zone: The DNS resolution process begins at the root zone (represented by a dot “.”), which contains information about the Top-Level Domain (TLD) nameservers.
2. TLD Zone: The TLD zone (e.g., .com, .org, .io) contains NS (nameserver) records pointing to the authoritative nameservers for registered domains within that TLD.
3. Domain Zone: Your domain’s zone contains the actual DNS records (A, AAAA, MX, TXT, etc.) that define how your domain functions.

 

When a user attempts to access your Web3 platform, their DNS resolver follows this delegation chain to locate your authoritative nameservers.

Technical Example of Delegation

A DNS query for a Web3 platform might follow this path:

 

# Example DNS resolution path for defi-platform.com

1. Root nameservers provide NS records for .com TLD
. IN NS a.root-servers.net.
. IN NS b.root-servers.net.
(and so on)

2. .com TLD nameservers provide NS records for defi-platform.com
com. IN NS a.gtld-servers.net.
com. IN NS b.gtld-servers.net.
(and so on)

3. Authoritative nameservers for defi-platform.com provide actual DNS records
defi-platform.com. IN NS ns1.provider.net.
defi-platform.com. IN NS ns2.provider.net.

4. These nameservers provide the A record for the domain
defi-platform.com. IN A 203.0.113.42

 

This delegation chain creates a critical security vulnerability: if an attacker changes your nameserver delegation at the registrar level, they control all DNS responses for your domain, effectively hijacking all user traffic.

Authoritative vs. Recursive Nameservers

Understanding the distinction between authoritative and recursive nameservers is crucial for security:

 

• Authoritative Nameservers: These servers hold the actual DNS records for your domain and provide definitive answers to DNS queries. Your nameserver delegation points to these servers.
• Recursive Nameservers: These servers (often operated by ISPs or public DNS providers like Cloudflare or Google) query the authoritative servers on behalf of users and cache the results.

 

From a security perspective, your primary concern is protecting the delegation to your authoritative nameservers, as this is the most common attack vector.

Common Nameserver Delegation Attacks

Web3 projects frequently face these nameserver-related attacks:

 

1. Delegation Hijacking

Delegation hijacking occurs when attackers modify the nameserver records at the registrar level, redirecting all DNS queries to attacker-controlled servers.

Technical Attack Path:

1. Attacker gains access to the domain registrar account
2. Attacker changes NS records to point to malicious nameservers
3. DNS propagation occurs (typically within minutes to hours)
4. All traffic to the domain is now directed to attacker-controlled servers

Real-World Example: In January 2023, a major DeFi protocol lost $14.5 million when attackers compromised their domain registrar account through a social engineering attack. The attackers changed the nameserver delegation, pointing users to a malicious frontend that drained their wallets.

 

2. Nameserver Compromise

Rather than changing the delegation, attackers may target the nameservers themselves.

Technical Attack Path:

1. Attacker identifies the DNS provider hosting your authoritative nameservers
2. Attacker compromises the DNS provider’s systems or your account with the provider
3. Attacker modifies DNS records (particularly A records) to point to malicious servers
4. Users are directed to the attacker’s infrastructure while nameserver delegation remains unchanged

Real-World Example: In July 2024, multiple crypto projects using Squarespace’s domain services were compromised during a migration from Google Domains. Despite having registrar locks in place, attackers exploited a vulnerability in the migration process to gain control of several high-profile domains.

 

3. Registrar Account Takeover

Registrar account takeover involves gaining unauthorized access to the domain management account.

Technical Attack Path:

1. Attacker obtains account credentials through phishing, credential stuffing, or other means
2. Attacker logs into the registrar account
3. Attacker changes nameserver delegation or DNS records
4. All traffic is redirected to attacker-controlled infrastructure

Real-World Example: According to Three Sigma’s research, Curve Finance suffered multiple DNS hijacking attacks that redirected users to counterfeit websites, leading to significant financial losses. The attackers gained access to the registrar account through credential theft.

 

4. Social Engineering

Social engineering attacks target the human element in domain management.

Technical Attack Path:

1. Attacker researches the target organization and identifies key personnel
2. Attacker impersonates authorized personnel in communications with the registrar
3. Attacker convinces registrar support staff to make unauthorized changes
4. Nameserver delegation is changed without proper authorization

Real-World Example: In March 2025, a popular NFT marketplace suffered a domain hijacking when attackers successfully social engineered the registrar’s support team. The attackers claimed to be the domain owner who had lost access to their account, convincing support staff to reset account credentials.

 

Impact of Successful Attacks

The consequences of nameserver delegation attacks on Web3 projects are severe:

1. Direct Financial Losses: Users interacting with malicious frontends can lose funds through unauthorized transactions. According to ChainAnalysis, over $2.2 billion was stolen in crypto in 2024, with a significant portion through infrastructure attacks.
2. Reputational Damage: Trust is paramount in the Web3 ecosystem. A successful attack can permanently damage a project’s reputation.
3. Regulatory Scrutiny: Security incidents attract unwanted regulatory attention and potential legal liability.
4. Recovery Challenges: Unlike traditional websites, where data can be restored from backups, blockchain transactions are irreversible, making recovery particularly challenging.

 

—

Think your project is secure? Double-check your blind spots.

Our free white paper, Domain & DNS Security for Crypto, DeFi and Web3 Platforms, breaks down where crypto teams are most vulnerable — and how to seal those gaps fast.

Download it here.

—

 

Technical Safeguards for Nameserver Security

1. Registry Locks

Registry locks prevent unauthorized nameserver changes by requiring out-of-band verification:

# Example registry lock status check (command line)
$ whois example.com | grep “Status”
Domain Status: serverUpdateProhibited
Domain Status: serverDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: serverTransferProhibited

 

The presence of “server” status codes (rather than “client” status codes) indicates registry-level locks are in place.

 

Implementation Requirements:

 

1. Provider Selection: Work with a registrar that supports registry locks. Not all registrars offer this service, particularly for certain TLDs.

 

2. Documentation: Complete the required documentation, which typically includes:

• Authorized contact designation
• Verification procedures
• Emergency protocols

 

3. Verification Setup: Establish secure out-of-band verification channels, such as:

• Dedicated phone numbers
• Hardware-based authentication
• Multi-person authorization

 

4. Monitoring Configuration: Implement monitoring for lock status changes:

• Regular WHOIS queries
• Automated alerts for status code changes
• Third-party monitoring services

 

Technical Considerations:

 

Registry locks operate at the registry level (e.g., Verisign for .com domains) rather than just at the registrar level. This provides significantly stronger protection, as changes require verification directly with the registry operator.

According to Brandsec, registry locks are particularly important for Web3 projects because they prevent the most common attack vector: nameserver delegation changes. Even if an attacker gains access to your registrar account, they cannot make immediate changes to your nameserver delegation.

 

2. DNSSEC Implementation

DNSSEC adds cryptographic signatures to DNS records, preventing spoofing:

# Example DNSSEC validation check
$ dig +dnssec +multi example.com

;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; ANSWER SECTION:
example.com. 86400 IN A 93.184.216.34
example.com. 86400 IN RRSIG A 8 2 86400 20230915000000 20230825000000 12345 example.com. kJCT…==

 

The ad flag indicates DNSSEC validation succeeded.

 

Implementation Steps:

 

1. Key Generation: Generate the necessary cryptographic keys:

• Zone Signing Key (ZSK): Used to sign individual DNS records
• Key Signing Key (KSK): Used to sign the ZSK

2. Zone Signing: Sign your DNS zone with the generated keys:

 

# Example BIND command for signing a zone

$ dnssec-signzone -A -3 $(head -c 16 /dev/random | hexdump -e ‘”%x”‘) -N INCREMENT -o example.com -t example.com.zone

 

3. DS Record Publication: Publish the Delegation Signer (DS) record at the parent zone (typically through your registrar):

 

# Example DS record

example.com. IN DS 12345 8 2 A69A553DE8361FEA8B3C0F1692DFFC5AE466C01D4F3E553CEDB5719B6D1F3648

 

4. Validation Testing: Verify DNSSEC is working correctly:

 

# Testing DNSSEC validation

$ dig +dnssec +cd example.com A

 

5. Key Management: Implement secure key management procedures:

• Secure storage of private keys
• Regular key rotation
• Monitoring of signature expiration

 

According to DomainSure’s research, DNSSEC is particularly important for Web3 projects because it prevents DNS spoofing attacks that could redirect users to malicious frontends. However, it’s important to note that DNSSEC does not protect against attacks at the registrar level, which is why it should be combined with registry locks.

 

3. Nameserver Redundancy

Implement nameserver redundancy across multiple providers:

 

# Example of diverse nameserver delegation
$ dig +short NS example.com
ns1.provider1.net.
ns2.provider1.net.
ns1.provider2.net.
ns2.provider2.net.

 

Best Practices:

 

Provider Diversity: Use at least two independent DNS providers to eliminate single points of failure. According to GreenCloud’s research, this is the most critical aspect of DNS redundancy.

Zone Synchronization: Ensure automatic zone synchronization between providers:

• API-based synchronization
• Git-based infrastructure as code
• Automated verification of consistency

 

TTL Optimization: Implement consistent TTL values across providers:

• Lower TTLs (300-900 seconds) for critical records
• Higher TTLs for stable records
• Emergency TTL reduction plan for incidents

 

Failover Testing: Regularly test failover scenarios:

• Simulated provider outages
• Monitoring response during transitions
• Recovery time measurement

 

Geographic Distribution: Ensure nameservers are distributed across different geographic regions:

• Multiple continents
• Different network providers
• Diverse routing paths

 

According to research from Catchpoint, when evaluating multiple DNS providers for your multi-DNS network, consider the global point of presence (PoP) of the provider along with their security practices and performance metrics.

 

4. Nameserver Delegation Monitoring

Implement continuous monitoring for nameserver delegation changes:

 

# Example Python monitoring script (simplified)

 

import dns.resolver

import requests

def check_nameservers(domain, expected_nameservers):

    try:

        answers = dns.resolver.resolve(domain, ‘NS’)

        current_nameservers = [ns.target.to_text().rstrip(‘.’) for ns in answers]

        if set(current_nameservers) != set(expected_nameservers):

            # Alert on unexpected nameserver changes

            send_alert(f”Nameserver change detected for {domain}”)

            return False

        return True

    except Exception as e:

        send_alert(f”Error checking nameservers for {domain}: {str(e)}”)

        return False

def send_alert(message):

    # Send alert via preferred channel (Slack, email, SMS, etc.)

    requests.post(‘https://alerts.example.com/webhook’, json={‘text’: message})

 

Monitoring Requirements:

 

1. Multi-Perspective Monitoring: Check nameserver configuration from multiple network vantage points:

• Different geographic locations
• Various ISPs
• Both IPv4 and IPv6 networks

 

2. Comprehensive Alerting: Implement alerts for various changes:

• Nameserver delegation changes
• DNS record modifications
• DNSSEC validation failures
• TTL modifications

 

3. Historical Logging: Maintain historical logs of all nameserver and DNS changes:

• Timestamped records
• Change attribution
• Correlation with authorized changes

 

4. Incident Response Integration: Integrate monitoring with incident response systems:

• Automated playbooks
• Escalation procedures
• Response time tracking

 

5. Third-Party Verification: Use external monitoring services as an additional layer:

• Certificate Transparency monitoring
• External DNS monitoring services
• Synthetic user journey testing

 

According to SOCRadar’s research on DNS monitoring tools, comprehensive monitoring should include not just technical checks but also behavioral analysis to detect anomalous patterns that might indicate an attack in progress.

 

5. Nameserver Access Controls

Implement strict access controls for nameserver management:

 

# Example Python monitoring script (simplified)

# Example access control configuration (conceptual)
{
“resource”: “nameserver_delegation”,
“actions”: [“update”, “view”],
“roles”: [“dns_admin”],
“authentication”: {
“mfa_required”: true,
“ip_restriction”: [“10.0.0.0/8”],
“approval_required”: true
}
}

 

Access Control Best Practices:

 

1. Role-Based Access: Implement granular role-based access control:

• DNS Administrator: Full access to DNS configuration
• DNS Operator: Access to specific zones or record types
• DNS Auditor: Read-only access for monitoring

 

2. Multi-Factor Authentication: Require strong MFA for all access:

• Hardware security keys (preferred)
• Time-based one-time passwords (TOTP)
• Out-of-band verification

 

3. IP Restrictions: Limit access to specific IP ranges:

• Corporate networks
• VPN endpoints
• Bastion hosts

 

4. Approval Workflows: Implement multi-person approval for critical changes:

• Separate requestor and approver roles
• Time-delayed implementation
• Automated validation of changes

 

5. Comprehensive Auditing: Log all access and change attempts:

• Who made the change
• What was changed
• When it was changed
• From where it was changed
• Approval chain documentation

 

According to Cantina.xyz’s research on preventing DNS hijacking for Web3, implementing strict access controls is one of the most effective measures against social engineering attacks, which remain a primary vector for nameserver delegation compromises.

 

Nameserver Failover Architecture

For critical Web3 infrastructure, implement automated nameserver failover:

 

Architecture Components

 

Monitoring Layer: Continuously checks nameserver availability and performance:

• Health checks from multiple locations
• Response time monitoring
• DNSSEC validation checks
• Record consistency verification

 

Decision Engine: Evaluates monitoring data against predefined thresholds:

• Outage detection algorithms
• Performance degradation analysis
• Attack pattern recognition
• False positive mitigation

 

Delegation Management: Automatically updates nameserver delegations when failures occur:

• API integration with registrars
• Pre-authorized emergency changes
• Staged implementation to prevent cascading failures
• Verification of successful changes

 

Verification System: Confirms successful delegation changes and DNS propagation:

• Global propagation monitoring
• Resolution testing from multiple perspectives
• End-to-end service validation
• User impact assessment

 

Reversion Logic: Returns to primary nameservers when issues are resolved:

• Automated health verification
• Gradual traffic return
• Monitoring during transition
• Post-incident analysis

 

According to DomainSure’s research, while registry locks provide critical security, they can complicate automated failover mechanisms. Projects must carefully balance security and availability requirements, potentially implementing hybrid approaches that maintain security while enabling rapid response to outages.

 

Incident Response for Nameserver Delegation Attacks

Despite preventive measures, all Web3 projects should prepare for potential nameserver delegation incidents:

Detection Procedures

Early Warning Indicators:

• Unexpected nameserver delegation changes
• Unusual DNS record modifications
• DNSSEC validation failures
• Certificate Transparency alerts for unauthorized certificates

 

User Reports:

• Establish clear channels for users to report suspicious behavior
• Monitor social media for reports of phishing or scams
• Implement community monitoring programs

 

Automated Detection:

• Continuous monitoring of nameserver configurations
• Behavioral analysis of DNS traffic
• Correlation of security events across infrastructure

 

Containment Strategies

Immediate Actions:

• Contact registrar emergency support
• Implement emergency registry lock (if not already in place)
• Issue public warnings through alternative channels
• Deploy temporary redirect notices on related properties

 

Traffic Diversion:

• If possible, redirect traffic to backup infrastructure
• Implement emergency DNS changes through secondary channels
• Deploy circuit breakers in smart contracts if applicable

 

Evidence Preservation:

• Capture forensic snapshots of DNS configurations
• Document all observed malicious behavior
• Preserve logs from all relevant systems
• Record timestamps of all events and actions

 

Recovery Procedures

Regaining Control:

• Work with registrar and registry to restore proper delegation
• Verify control through out-of-band testing
• Implement fresh credentials and access controls
• Perform comprehensive security audit before full restoration

 

User Communication:

• Issue clear communications about the incident
• Provide specific guidance for affected users
• Establish dedicated support channels for affected users
• Maintain transparent updates throughout recovery

 

Post-Incident Analysis:

• Conduct thorough root cause analysis
• Document attack vectors and techniques
• Implement security improvements based on findings
• Share sanitized findings with the broader Web3 community

 

—

Crypto projects win when they protect their access points.

Grab your free copy of Domain & DNS Security for Crypto, DeFi and Web3 Platforms — and get the blueprint for securing your domains against hijacks, phishing, and DNS exploits.

Download now.

—

 

Implementation Roadmap

For Web3 infrastructure teams, implement these measures in the following order:

 

Immediate (0-30 days)

1. Registry Locks: Implement registry locks for all critical domains.
2. Access Controls: Establish strict access controls for domain and DNS management.
3. Basic Monitoring: Deploy fundamental nameserver and DNS monitoring.
4. Incident Response: Develop basic incident response procedures for nameserver attacks.

Short-term (1-3 months)

1. Enhanced Monitoring: Implement comprehensive nameserver monitoring and alerting.
2. Access Workflow Improvements: Develop approval workflows for critical DNS changes.
3. Documentation: Create detailed documentation for all nameserver security procedures.
4. Training: Conduct security training for all personnel with DNS access.

Medium-term (3-6 months)

1. DNSSEC Implementation: Deploy DNSSEC for all production domains.
2. Provider Evaluation: Assess current DNS providers and identify secondary providers.
3. Automation: Implement automation for DNS management with appropriate safeguards.
4. Testing: Develop and execute comprehensive testing procedures for DNS security.

Long-term (6+ months)

1. Nameserver Redundancy: Implement multi-provider nameserver architecture.
2. Failover Architecture: Deploy automated monitoring and failover capabilities.
3. Advanced Monitoring: Implement behavioral analysis and anomaly detection.
4. Continuous Improvement: Establish regular security reviews and updates.

Conclusion

Nameserver delegation security is a critical component of Web3 infrastructure protection. By implementing these technical safeguards, you can protect your platform from attacks that target the DNS layer—often the weakest link in otherwise secure crypto projects.

Remember that nameserver security must be part of a comprehensive domain and DNS security strategy that includes registrar security, monitoring, and incident response capabilities. The most secure Web3 projects recognize that blockchain technology alone cannot protect users if the pathways to that technology are compromised.

As the Web3 ecosystem continues to evolve, nameserver delegation security will remain a critical focus area for security teams. By implementing the technical measures outlined in this guide, you can significantly reduce the risk of nameserver-based attacks and protect your users from threats that bypass blockchain security entirely.

 

Download our complete guide to “Domain & DNS Security for Crypto, DeFi and Web3 Platforms” for detailed implementation instructions on building comprehensive security across Web2 and Web3 boundaries.