Whois Privacy Shouldn't Be an Upsell. Especially Not in Crypto

Why Whois Privacy Defaulted is the only responsible starting position for Web3 platforms

—

You Secured Everything Except the Front Door

Let me describe a scenario that plays out more often than it should.

A DeFi protocol spends months preparing for launch. Smart contract audits… done. Bug bounty program… live. Multisig treasury controls… configured. Hardware wallets… distributed to key signers. The security posture looks solid. The team is proud of what they’ve built.

Then someone registers your domain name through a budget registrar, checks the box to get the site online, and never gives it a second thought.

Here’s what that registrar did automatically, on your behalf, the moment that domain was created: it published your registrant’s legal name, email address, phone number, physical mailing address, and organizational affiliation in a public database, which is accessible to anyone on earth, for free, in about four seconds.

No breach required. No exploit. Just a standard WHOIS lookup.

This is the blind spot. And unlike most security vulnerabilities, it doesn’t require a sophisticated attacker to exploit. It requires a browser and thirty seconds.

What a WHOIS Record Actually Exposes

Most Web3 founders and CTOs have a general awareness that WHOIS is a thing. What they often don’t appreciate is how operationally detailed that public record can be, and what a determined threat actor can do with it.

A standard, unprotected WHOIS record typically includes:

Registrant name (often the founder or CTO personally)
Organization name
Email address
Phone number
Physical mailing address
Administrative and technical contact details
Registration and expiry dates

For a crypto founder, that data is a targeting dossier. Every field maps to a widely-known, cheap, and wide attack vector.

The phone number is a SIM swap waiting to happen. Phone carriers are notoriously susceptible to social engineering, and SIM swap attacks against crypto industry participants are not rare events, they’re an industry of their own. One successful swap, and the attacker owns your phone number.

The email address is a spear-phishing anchor. With your name, your organization, and your role all publicly confirmed, a targeted phishing email becomes trivially convincing.

The physical address enables a range of threats that most people in this industry prefer not to think about. Yet they need to because the amount of value being managed make them realistic.

And the organizational details make social engineering of your registrar’s support staff considerably easier. Your domain itself becomes a target once an attacker knows who registered it, who to impersonate, and what registrar to call.

The attack doesn’t need to touch your smart contracts. It only needs to touch your registrar. And your WHOIS record just told them exactly who to ask for, impersonate, or use for phishing records.

The Registrar Industry’s Default And Why It Exists

Here is something from Managing Mission-Critical Domains and DNS that we stand by completely:

the domain registrar industry is the most institutionally lethargic, rentier class of operators on the entire internet.

We’re not saying that to be polarizing. It’s a structural observation.

Most registrars ship every domain with WHOIS fully public by default. Privacy protection is an add-on. It is sometimes free in name, but rarely free in practice. And when it is offered for free, it’s worth examining why.

Here’s the uncomfortable answer:

Many registrars offer “free” WHOIS privacy not as a service to you, but as a lock-in mechanism. Enabling privacy at signup is one checkbox. Disabling it when you want to transfer to a different registrar is a multi-step process designed to be as difficult and slow as possible. The privacy feature that was trivially easy to enable becomes a friction wall at the moment your interests and the registrar’s diverge.

So you have an industry that defaults to exposing your data, charges you to protect it, and then uses that protection as leverage to retain your business. That’s the baseline. That’s what crypto projects are navigating when they register domains at generic, mass-market registrars with no understanding of (and no particular affinity for) the threats facing this industry.

The interests of a commodity registrar are not aligned with yours. They never were. In the Web3 context, I hope you are beginning to see how the misalignment is even more dangerous.

Why Crypto Is a Different Risk Category Entirely

Every business that registers a domain has some exposure from public WHOIS data. That’s a real problem for any organization. But it’s not the same problem that faces a DeFi protocol, a CEX, or a Web3 infrastructure project.

The threat profile in crypto is categorically different for several reasons.

First, the stakes are quantifiably enormous. A mid-sized DeFi protocol might have tens or hundreds of millions in TVL. The founding team and key technical signers are known individuals, sometimes publicly, sometimes only through WHOIS. The ratio of potential payout to attack cost is astronomical compared to any traditional business target.

Second, the attack surface is global and pseudonymous. Threat actors in this space operate across jurisdictions, around the clock, with tooling and playbooks specifically developed for the crypto industry. SIM swap gangs, social engineering specialists, and domain hijack crews are active, organized, and well-resourced.

Third, the regulatory and reputational exposure cuts both ways. Your WHOIS data can be used not only to attack you operationally, but to identify founding team members for jurisdictional targeting, competitor intelligence, or doxxing campaigns designed to create platform instability.

Fourth, in fast-moving Web3 teams, domains get registered constantly. They get registered for new products, marketing campaigns, testnet environments, community tools. Each one registered carelessly through a commodity registrar is another public record. Another data point. Another attack surface.

In any other security context, leaving sensitive personnel data publicly exposed would be considered negligent. Domain registration has somehow escaped that standard — until now.

Why “Defaulted” Is the Operative Word

There is a meaningful difference between privacy as an opt-in feature and privacy as the default starting position. It’s not semantic. It’s operational.

When privacy is opt-in, every domain that slips through the process without it enabled is exposed. And in a high-velocity Web3 team, where engineers are spinning up infrastructure, marketing is registering campaign URLs, and community managers are grabbing names for subprojects…

Domains get registered at 11pm on a deadline with no time to review the settings.

Default-off privacy means that gaps accumulate silently. One forgotten checkbox on one domain registered in a hurry is all it takes to surface a founder’s phone number to anyone who knows how to run a WHOIS query.

Default-on privacy means the protection is already there. No gaps. No Tuesday-night oversights. No audit required three months later to figure out what got exposed and when.

This is why we built Whois Privacy Defaulted into DomainSure’s platform as a foundational stance, not a feature. Every domain registered through DomainSure ships with privacy protection on. It’s not an upsell. It’s not a checkbox. At Domainsure it is the baseline because for a crypto project operating in this threat environment, it’s the only baseline that makes sense.

What Good Whois Privacy Actually Looks Like

Not all WHOIS privacy is created equal, and it’s worth understanding what you’re actually getting.

Real privacy protection means the underlying registrant data (your name, email, phone, address) is replaced in the public WHOIS record with the details of a privacy proxy. Queries return the proxy’s information, not yours.

But the proxy has responsibilities too. Legitimate communications from law enforcement, from ICANN compliance, from genuine legal processes need to reach you. A privacy proxy that simply discards everything isn’t protecting you; it’s creating a different category of risk by making you non-contactable for legitimate purposes, which can itself become grounds for domain suspension.

At DomainSure, the privacy layer is active, not passive. It screens and routes. It’s also operated by a team that understands the crypto threat model because that’s the business we’re in. Generic registrars offering privacy as a bundled commodity haven’t thought carefully about what the proxy relationship means in practice. We have.

There’s also the matter of what happens when you need to make changes. Privacy shouldn’t become a wall that traps you. At DomainSure, disabling or modifying privacy settings when you legitimately need to is straightforward because we’re not using it as a retention mechanism.

The Bottom Line

Privacy protection for domain registrations is not a nice-to-have. It’s not a premium feature. For a crypto, DeFi, or Web3 project operating in today’s threat environment, it is a minimum viable security control.

Your protocol’s security posture starts before the blockchain. It starts before your smart contracts. It starts the moment you register a domain, and that registration, by default, publishes a detailed record of who you are and how to reach you.

The organizations that understand this have already moved. Many of the projects that learned it the hard way have moved to DomainSure after incidents that started not with a compromised contract, but with a WHOIS lookup and a phone call.

You have the option to make a different decision now, before you become a data point in someone else’s post-mortem.

Privacy shouldn’t be an upsell. At DomainSure, it isn’t.

Find Out What Your Whois Record Is Currently Exposing

Book a free Domain Threat Assessment with DomainSure.

We’ll show you exactly what attackers can see, and what to do about it.

Whois Privacy Shouldn’t Be an Upsell. Especially Not in Crypto

Why Whois Privacy Defaulted is the only responsible starting position for Web3 platforms